The Corporati
In 1995, some co-workers and I developed a science
fiction game concept. In this game, set in the near
future in year 2025, the global corporate interests had
exceeded the power of the federal government. Ten massive
corporations formed a single uneasy conglomerate, a
keiritsu, with the goal to purchase a struggling
California from the United States. A deal that could be
summarized as, "We'll take care of the failing
infrastructure, in exchange for legal sovereignty
throughout the state." In the sprawl, the ten feudal
Corporati formed a contentious government of the money,
for the money, and by the money.
That was science fiction, right? I'm not so sure
now. Read a few of the practices of real companies, real
cases in the courts, and real laws that our government
has enacted against the rights of citizens, and tell me
that we don't live in a world governed by the
corporation.
And remember: Corporations have no vested interest in
the rights of an individual.
|
Adobe, Inc. Arrests Dmitry Sklyarov for Speaking
2001-07-16 Las Vegas - Dmitry Sklyarov of
Elcomsoft held a talk at Def Con 9, a prominent computer
security conference. The presentation was entitled
"eBook Security: Theory and Practice." The
presentation and software offered by Elcomsoft highlight
the insecure features of eBook products, and to show
conference attendees why they should not entrust these
products for secure information. (Flaws relating to other
Adobe products, notably Acrobat, have also made
headlines, where reporters have found poorly obscured
sensitive data in public files.)
Adobe had Dmitry arrested by the FBI, under the pretext
that the conference and the Elcomsoft software were
illegal per the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. This is
at least the second time DMCA has been wielded as a
threat against the existing legal rights to speak freely,
to assemble peaceably in discussions critical of the law,
and to reverse engineer products in research. Rather than
focus their corporate interests in improving their
insecure products, they decided to hire the FBI to detain
this Russian "hacker" instead. This is not
about copyrights, this is about freedoms, and Adobe does
not apparently believe in the freedom of expression.
Adobe can have their cake and eat it too, with this bad
legislation that they and other corporations lobbied for.
When the public relations disaster struck, Adobe pulled
out of the case, but left the real victim in jail. The
U.S. Federal Government is now detaining and prosecuting
a foreign national for "crimes" committed abroad, where
there is no complainant in the case, no evidence of
intent or actual injury to Adobe or any other copyright
holder.
I'll vote against Adobe with my dollars. I also find it
scary but amusing that the text of the DMCA is published
on the US Government websites almost exclusively in Adobe
Acrobat file formats.
Corporations have no vested interest in the rights of an
individual.
|
|
Chemical Rubber Company steals MathWorld Copyright
2001-11-06 Mathematician Eric Weisstein created a
wildly popular website called MathWorld, where all sorts
of mathematics fans gathered and browsed the columns and
resources there.
As an adjunct to the vibrant, growing site, he entered
into a deal to CRC Press LLC, a publisher originally
known as the Chemical Rubber Company. The deal was for
CRC to print and promote a thick book which was a mere
snapshot of the MathWorld site.
In the second year, the book's sales flagged
significantly, and the price was boosted by CRC out of
the reach of its intended audience of students.
Promotions for the book were also dropped to focus on
newer publications.
Even though Eric carefully tuned and adjusted his site
to avoid any mass duplication (allowing visitors to roam
at will but blocking any detected attempt to copy the
whole site), and even though CRC failed to promote the
print book as promised in the agreement, CRC decided that
there was more money availble by suing Eric and shutting
down the MathWorld site as an illicit copy of CRC's
book!
Unfortunately, Eric's new employer, Wolfram Research,
decided to bail on this crazy lawsuit and settle with
terrible terms that (1) gives CRC Press LLC money where
book sales were not, (2) ensures CRC Press LLC can
publish future snapshots of the website without entering
into new copyright negotiations, (3) requires that
third-party visitor submissions to the site must grant
their own copyrights to CRC Press LLC, and (4) forces CRC
Press copyright notices on all of Eric's website pages
even though CRC never sought to acquire those such rights
or stipulations in the initial contract.
Lesson here: don't trust legal counsel when they say
"it's all boilerplate legalese." Eric called CRC to tell
them that they were failing on their agreements to
promote one book, and lost almost all of his rights to
his own life's work in the process.
Corporations have no vested interest in the rights of an
individual.
|
|
|